A MONTHLY SUPPLEMENT OF RAKAN SARAWAK BULLETIN

(People, events, activities and programmes which make for a total quality-managed Sarawak Civil Service)

  ISSN 1394-5726
 
Online Publisher:
 
Contents provided by:
 
 
evisiting Core Competencies and Professionalism in the Public Sector

Each year, since the implementation of the New Remuneration Scheme, public sector managers are asked to identify five of their major responsibilities as part and parcel of target-setting. Some officers may find this requirement easy while others may find it difficult. Why is this so? Simply stated, writing down one’s roles on paper demands some thinking, let alone translating these roles into purposive action.

What are the main roles of public sector managers? Are we constantly changing our roles in tandem with new job demands? What are the current performance standards like? Is there a rising expectation from clients? Can managers deliver the goods and services in a professional way? What about the need to upgrade the capacity of managers and their core competencies needed to deal with myriads of situations?

According to Mintzberg, a manager essentially displays 10 roles - as a figurehead, leader, liaison, monitor, disseminator, spokesperson, entrepreneur, disturbance handler, resource allocator and last but not least negotiator. In short, a 21st century manager is becoming more of a multi-skilled person rather than doing only a specialist job. Indeed, the complexities surrounding work itself makes the manager’s roles becoming more complicated. In a general sense, public sector managers tackle ‘front-line’ responsibilities, undertake strategic decisions and allocate resources to achieve certain goals. They also ensure that alignment and synergy are kept alive in the departments and agencies. They are expected to integrate activities and create a supportive working environment. A deep understanding of how individuals and teams perform is another added advantage. In some instances, their ability to energize and revitalize poor-performing organisation is crucial in ensuring successful turnarounds. Such balance of skills displayed is generally referred to as “core competencies.”

Core competencies can be categorically classified as “hard” and “soft” skills. Hard skills encompass aspects like planning, scheduling and controlling. Soft skills involve behaviour, attitude and communication style. Hard skills determine the goals and processes while soft skills ensure that people can meet those objectives.

Where soft skills are concerned, professionals connect rather than direct. It goes without saying that departments and agencies are arenas of human interaction. This is where public managers have to blend their IQ and EQ (Emotional Intelligence). On one hand, the competency to demonstrate intellectual rigour depends on the manager’s maturity, orientations and training. On the other hand, the importance of relationship-building emphasizes the value of collaboration internally across departments, districts and divisions and externally with strategic partners and alliances . You need to know all the players in your departments and agencies as much as knowing your own turf and technical knowledge. This is where communications competency can assist them to formulate a policy that is able to reflect and disseminate shared vision, mission and values. Only when managers can excel in all these core competencies can they be described as professionals.

Professionalism is sometimes construed as the pursuit of excellence (not just competence) and strict adherence to the highest values. Professionals believe passionately in what they do and never compromise their standards and values. We often wonder how colonial bureaucrats of yesteryears were able to write passionately on subjects they loved. Today, it is getting very rare to receive in-depth reports and writings from amongst our very own officers. What is happening and where have things gone wrong? With a new era, it is now timely to play our proper role in writing and putting down our idea like those folks of yesteryears.

In the modern context, professionalism evokes doing work with pride, delivering quality goods and services with a sincere desire and commitment to help people. In this respect, it is heartening to note that more and more agencies have obtained their MS ISO 9000 certification and a host of other agencies queuing to jump aboard the quality bandwagon. And yet one must be reminded that the task does not stop after receiving certification. In fact, it is only the beginning of a long professional journey.

Besides the commitment to excellence, professionals are almost always characterized by high performance standards, mastery of procedures that meet those standards, principle-centred (as opposed to money-centred), exemplary, role-models plus the constant determination for self-improvement. Professionalism entails strict behavioral standards like respect for bosses, peers and underlings. Professional managers often exude an aura of dignity, invincibility and the ability to rise to the occasion. They are not automatons, sycophants and flatterers performing mindless rituals, routines and regulations set by their bosses. They understand what they are doing and the reasons behind their actions. As a unique trait, professionalism is a dynamic capability that produces its own demands. Above all, professional success requires more than talent. It requires drive, initiative, commitment, involvement and a fiery enthusiasm to constantly deliver the best.

The bottom-line is that the Sarawak Civil Service has little room for incompetencies and slipshod delivery of the public goods and services. Tolerating these demons can taint the image of the Civil Service and the whole institution may crumble because of sheer disregard for noble values, particularly professionalism. Incompetencies like poor surroundings maintenance, disjointed handing-over process and laidback culture such as slumbering in comfort zone must be treated as things of the past. What it takes to be world-class managers is a bone of contention. There are in fact many ways to become world class. Perhaps we can start by pondering on the following maxims, “Never mind the rmyth, feel the reality.” “Never mind the pain, feel the gain.” For District Officers in the State, what about the slogan “Do not let Julau change you, You change Julau!” These mantras should reverberate within us. The genesis of a world-class public sector is a tall order. Small actions can lead to big changes in the public sector. Always remember that a journey of a thousand miles begins with the first step.

 
 
 
   Special Focus | News | Teamwork | Sports & Recreation | Know Your Sub-District | Agensi & Anda  

Main Page | Archives: 2007: December 2007 | November 2007 | October 2007 | September 2007 | August 2007 | July 2007 | June 2007 | May 2007 | April 2007 | March 2007 | February 2007 | January 2007

2006: September 2006 - November 2006 | June 2006 - August 2006 | May 2006 | April 2006 | March 2006 | February 2006 | January 2006

2005: December 2005 | November 2005 | October 2005 | September 2005 | August 2005 | July 2005 | June 2005 | May 2005 | April 2005 | March 2005 | February 2005 | January 2005

2004: December 2004 | Sept 2004 - Nov 2004 | June 2004 - August 2004 | May 2004 | April 2004 | March 2004 | February 2004 | January 2004

2003: December 2003 | November 2003 | October 2003 | September 2003 | August 2003 | July 2003 | June 2003 | May 2003 | April 2003 | March 2003 | February 2003 | January 2003

2002: December 2002 | November 2002 | October 2002 | September 2002 | August 2002 | July 2002 | June 2002 | May 2002 | April 2002 | March 2002 | February 2002 | January 2002

2001: December 2001 | November 2001 | October 2001 | September 2001 | August 2001 | July 2001 | June 2001 | May 2001 | April 2001 | March 2001 | February 2001 | January 2001

2000: December 2000 | November 2000 | October 2000 | September 2000 | August 2000 | July 2000 | June 2000 | May 2000 | April 2000 | March 2000 | February 2000 | January 2000

1999: December 1999 | November 1999 | October 1999 | September 1999 | August 1999 | July 1999 | June 1999 | May 1999 | April 1999 | March 1999 | February 1999 | January 1999

1998: December 1998 | November 1998 | October 1998 | September 1998 | August 1998 | July 1998 | June 1998 | May 1998 | April 1998 | March 1998 | February 1998 | January 1998